<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation in Education is *not* ICT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ezekiels.co.uk/eylan/innovation-in-education-is-not-ict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ezekiels.co.uk/eylan/innovation-in-education-is-not-ict/</link>
	<description>Innovation in Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Young and Old - Traditionalists trash tech in teaching &#124; Eylan Ezekiel</title>
		<link>http://www.ezekiels.co.uk/eylan/innovation-in-education-is-not-ict/#comment-30281</link>
		<dc:creator>Young and Old - Traditionalists trash tech in teaching &#124; Eylan Ezekiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ezekiels.co.uk/eylan/?p=317#comment-30281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] As I have said in recent posts, I fear that ICT (the term) has damaged more than the cause of edtech, and is allowing the reactionary voices to pull us back to a model of education that never worked, even in its heyday &#8211; except for the the most privileged. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I have said in recent posts, I fear that ICT (the term) has damaged more than the cause of edtech, and is allowing the reactionary voices to pull us back to a model of education that never worked, even in its heyday &#8211; except for the the most privileged. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
